<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ChangeItMarketing! - Latest Comments in What can I edit in a Twitter Re-Tweet?</title><link>http://changeitmarketing.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://changeitmarketing.disqus.com/what_can_i_edit_in_a_twitter_re_tweet/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:29:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What can I edit in a Twitter Re-Tweet?</title><link>http://www.changeitmarketing.com/2009/02/04/what-can-i-edit-in-a-twitter-re-tweet/#comment-31424800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! I like that approach, but am just too lazy to do it most of the time I think. I think Tweetie does that by default however.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kevinurie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:29:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What can I edit in a Twitter Re-Tweet?</title><link>http://www.changeitmarketing.com/2009/02/04/what-can-i-edit-in-a-twitter-re-tweet/#comment-31424315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RT reminds me of quoting, which implies not changing anything. In reality, direct quotes don't work so well on Twitter, so here's my compromise: If I alter the wording of a tweet significantly, I use (via @twittername) instead of RT to credit the original source.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rasmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:23:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>